COSMO · STUDY + TEACHING DECKProblem Solving
June 21, 2026
C. A question worth sharingInvariants
Track what cannot change, and impossibility becomes visible.
ThinkCompareExplain
Today’s routeA question becomes an explanation.
Try
Enter through a problem. A partial attempt counts.
Connect
Use state, move, invariant to name what you notice.
Convince
Build an argument a partner can check.
The goal is a method someone else can use.
The openerStart with a question.
Opening problem
A standard chessboard loses two opposite corners. Can the remaining board be tiled by 1 x 2 dominoes?
Think · 2 min
Sketch, test a small case, or make a first guess.
Pair · 3 min
Compare methods. Find one thing you agree on and one question.
Be ready to share your route, even if it is unfinished.
Compare before checkingPut two attempts in conversation.
Explain
Tell a partner how you started. Let them finish before responding.
Question
Which step feels certain? Which step still needs evidence?
Build
Combine one useful idea from each attempt into a new route.
Can you explain your partner’s method in your own words?
Board conversationNotice before naming.
Look for structure
- 01Color the board as a normal checkerboard.
- 02Count removed black and white squares.
- 03Ask what every domino always covers.
Make a conjecture
We think ___ because ___. A case that might break this is ___.
What changed? What stayed the same?
Useful languageNow the language has a job.
state
the current configuration
invariant
a quantity or property every move preserves
Use one of these words to explain something you already noticed.
The core ideaKeep the idea. Explain the conditions.
I(St+1)=I(St)⟹I(St)=I(S0) The idea
Track what cannot change, and impossibility becomes visible.
What to remember
Do not follow every move; track the information every move cannot erase.
What information does this method keep?
Worked exampleOne route, one decision at a time
The problem
Why can the mutilated chessboard not be tiled?
Predict each next step
- 01Opposite corners have the same color.
- 02Removing them leaves 30 of one color and 32 of the other.
- 03Every domino covers one square of each color.
- 04A complete tiling would require equal counts, so it is impossible.
Which step needs a reason, not just a calculation?
See the structureColoring exposes information shape alone hides
Read the representation
The checkerboard coloring is not decoration. It creates a count that every legal domino placement preserves.
Look together
Point to the part that explains the relationship. Change one input and predict what changes.
Two approachesCompare the reasoning.
Invariant
- 01Exactly preserved by every move.
- 02Useful for impossibility.
- 03Examples: parity, color balance, modular class.
Monovariant
- 01Moves only one direction.
- 02Useful for termination.
- 03Examples: energy decreases or disorder count drops.
Which route can you justify? What would you test first?
Reasoning clinicFind the step that needs repair.
Investigate these concerns
- 01Moves only one direction.
- 02Useful for termination.
- 03Examples: energy decreases or disorder count drops.
Repair together
Name the missing condition. Try a small counterexample. Rewrite one step so it is justified.
A useful correction explains why the original step fails.
Work togetherInvent a useful coloring
Your shared task
Groups try two-color and three-color schemes on a board puzzle, then defend which one reveals the obstruction.
Explore
5 min - test colorings
Compare
5 min - track one move
Defend
4 min - state the invariant
Everyone should be able to explain the group’s final claim.
Share → connectWhat did the room discover?
Bring your evidence
Share a conjecture, a useful example, or a route that changed.
Connections to investigate
- 01An invariant must be checked against every allowed move.
- 02The starting and target states can be compared without simulating every path.
- 03A failed invariant may still suggest a stronger modulus or coloring.
Which observation explains the mechanism?
Try → explain → checkYour turn to build the route
The problem
Starting at 0, each move adds 4 or subtracts 6. Can you reach 101?
Predict each next step
- 01Both moves change the number by an even amount.
- 02Parity therefore stays even.
- 03The starting value 0 is even.
- 04101 is odd, so it is unreachable.
Which step needs a reason, not just a calculation?
Convince a skepticTurn a pattern into a proof.
The claim
A strictly decreasing nonnegative integer-valued quantity proves a process must stop.
Build the argument
- 01Choose an integer-valued quantity that drops on every move.
- 02It can never fall below zero.
- 03Only finitely many decreases are possible, so the process terminates.
What does each step rely on? Where are the conditions used?
Stretch togetherTake the idea somewhere new.
Transfer challenge
For a coin-turning game, decide whether parity of heads is preserved, flipped, or useless under each allowed move.
Choose a route
Name the objects, the conditions, and a relationship that might help. Start with one test case.
What transfers from the earlier example? What is different?
Peer reviewCheck the argument together.
Restate
Explain the other person’s route before evaluating it.
Test
Try a small case or boundary case. Does every step still make sense?
Revise
Fix an assumption, add a reason, or find a second method.
Where did your thinking change?
Beyond this problemWhere might this idea help?
A connection
Board puzzles, algorithms, games, parity arguments, and termination proofs become manageable when one stable quantity is found.
Discuss the model
- 01What objects or quantities are represented?
- 02Which relationship from today is preserved?
- 03What assumption would you check before trusting it?
Invent one more situation with the same structure.
Exit ticketLeave with an explanation.
Question 1
What must be checked before calling something invariant?
Question 2
Why does the chessboard coloring prove impossibility?
Question 3
How is a monovariant different?
Choose one. Write an answer with a reason, then compare with a partner.
Reflect togetherMake your thinking visible.
I used to think…
Name a claim or approach that changed.
Now I can explain…
Give the reason, not only the result.
I still wonder…
Write a question worth bringing to the next circle.
Share one sentence. Ask one follow-up question.
The idea to keepDo not follow every move; track the information every move cannot erase.
On the worksheet, write START, MOVE EFFECT, and TARGET before attempting a simulation.
A good question belongs to everyone in the room. 1 / 21
← → to navigate and reveal · N for notes · F to present · Esc to exit