COSMO · STUDY + TEACHING DECKNetworks
January 11, 2026
C. A question worth sharingGraph Coloring
Assign limited labels so adjacent objects never conflict.
ThinkCompareExplain
Today’s routeA question becomes an explanation.
Try
Enter through a problem. A partial attempt counts.
Connect
Use proper coloring, chromatic number, clique to name what you notice.
Convince
Build an argument a partner can check.
The goal is a method someone else can use.
The openerStart with a question.
Opening problem
How many colors does an odd cycle require?
Think · 2 min
Sketch, test a small case, or make a first guess.
Pair · 3 min
Compare methods. Find one thing you agree on and one question.
Be ready to share your route, even if it is unfinished.
Compare before checkingPut two attempts in conversation.
Explain
Tell a partner how you started. Let them finish before responding.
Question
Which step feels certain? Which step still needs evidence?
Build
Combine one useful idea from each attempt into a new route.
Can you explain your partner’s method in your own words?
Board conversationNotice before naming.
Look for structure
- 01Try a small case and record every step.
- 02Separate what changes from what stays fixed.
- 03State the pattern in a sentence before naming the theorem.
Make a conjecture
We think ___ because ___. A case that might break this is ___.
What changed? What stayed the same?
Useful languageNow the language has a job.
proper coloring
adjacent vertices receive different colors
chromatic number
fewest colors needed
clique
set of pairwise adjacent vertices
Use one of these words to explain something you already noticed.
The core ideaKeep the idea. Explain the conditions.
G is bipartite⟺G has no odd cycle The idea
Assign limited labels so adjacent objects never conflict.
What to remember
A coloring turns pairwise conflicts into a global resource plan.
What information does this method keep?
Worked exampleOne route, one decision at a time
The problem
Color a six-cycle with the fewest colors.
Predict each next step
- 01Alternate colors A and B around the cycle.
- 02The even length returns consistently.
- 03Every edge joins different colors.
- 04Two colors are necessary and sufficient.
Which step needs a reason, not just a calculation?
See the structureThe structure behind graph coloring
Read the representation
Assign limited labels so adjacent objects never conflict.
Look together
Point to the part that explains the relationship. Change one input and predict what changes.
What can you see here that was harder to see in words?
Two approachesCompare the reasoning.
Structural method
- 01Name the objects and conditions.
- 02Use a reusable relationship.
- 03Explain why the method must work.
Brute force
- 01May help with a small test case.
- 02Can hide the general reason.
- 03Becomes unreliable when the scale grows.
Which route can you justify? What would you test first?
Reasoning clinicFind the step that needs repair.
Investigate these concerns
- 01May help with a small test case.
- 02Can hide the general reason.
- 03Becomes unreliable when the scale grows.
Repair together
Name the missing condition. Try a small counterexample. Rewrite one step so it is justified.
A useful correction explains why the original step fails.
Work togetherInvestigate graph coloring
Your shared task
Teams model a scheduling conflict graph and compare greedy colorings from different vertex orders.
Explore
4 min - test cases
Compare
5 min - form a rule
Defend
4 min - defend the rule
Everyone should be able to explain the group’s final claim.
Share → connectWhat did the room discover?
Bring your evidence
Share a conjecture, a useful example, or a route that changed.
Connections to investigate
- 01A coloring turns pairwise conflicts into a global resource plan.
- 02A complete solution names the condition that makes the method valid.
- 03A counterexample is useful when it exposes a missing condition.
Which observation explains the mechanism?
Try → explain → checkYour turn to build the route
The problem
Explain why a graph containing K4 needs at least four colors.
Predict each next step
- 01Every pair of K4 vertices is adjacent.
- 02No two vertices may share a color.
- 03Four distinct vertices need four distinct colors.
- 04Thus the chromatic number is at least four.
Which step needs a reason, not just a calculation?
Convince a skepticTurn a pattern into a proof.
The claim
A graph is bipartite exactly when it contains no odd cycle.
Build the argument
- 01A two-coloring cannot close consistently around an odd cycle.
- 02If no odd cycle exists, breadth-first levels by parity give two parts.
- 03Edges never join vertices with the same parity level.
What does each step rely on? Where are the conditions used?
Stretch togetherTake the idea somewhere new.
Transfer challenge
Find the chromatic number of the wheel formed from a five-cycle plus a center adjacent to every cycle vertex.
Choose a route
Name the objects, the conditions, and a relationship that might help. Start with one test case.
What transfers from the earlier example? What is different?
Peer reviewCheck the argument together.
Restate
Explain the other person’s route before evaluating it.
Test
Try a small case or boundary case. Does every step still make sense?
Revise
Fix an assumption, add a reason, or find a second method.
Where did your thinking change?
Beyond this problemWhere might this idea help?
A connection
Coloring models exam schedules, frequency assignment, registers, and map constraints.
Discuss the model
- 01What objects or quantities are represented?
- 02Which relationship from today is preserved?
- 03What assumption would you check before trusting it?
Invent one more situation with the same structure.
Exit ticketLeave with an explanation.
Question 1
How many colors does an odd cycle require?
Question 2
Explain why this claim is true: A graph is bipartite exactly when it contains no odd cycle.
Question 3
Find the chromatic number of the wheel formed from a five-cycle plus a center adjacent to every cycle vertex.
Choose one. Write an answer with a reason, then compare with a partner.
Reflect togetherMake your thinking visible.
I used to think…
Name a claim or approach that changed.
Now I can explain…
Give the reason, not only the result.
I still wonder…
Write a question worth bringing to the next circle.
Share one sentence. Ask one follow-up question.
The idea to keepA coloring turns pairwise conflicts into a global resource plan.
Use the matching practice sets to move from direct examples to proof and transfer.
A good question belongs to everyone in the room. 1 / 21
← → to navigate and reveal · N for notes · F to present · Esc to exit